ITEM: itemID 1841 Handwritten VT Legal Manuscript Lawsuit Note Patent Fraud Steam Engine Gove for sale - Collectorcarsforsale.com
Click here to view our ENITRE INVENTORY of awesome cars!
Home | Contact Us | Advanced Search | Place an ad | Edit Your Ad | Links | Classic Car Parts
-1930's + | 1940 - 1949 | 1950 - 1959 | 1960 - 1969 | 1970 - 1979 | 1980 - 1989 | 1990 - 1999 | 2000 - 2010
Click Here To Place An Ad

 

Classic Car Parts Home >


Search for Classic Car Parts:


1841 Handwritten VT Legal Manuscript Lawsuit Note Patent Fraud Steam Engine Gove for sale

1841 Handwritten VT Legal Manuscript Lawsuit Note Patent Fraud Steam Engine Gove
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Buy Now

1841 Handwritten VT Legal Manuscript Lawsuit Note Patent Fraud Steam Engine Gove:
$149.77

We combine shipping.
1841 Handwritten VT Legal Manuscript Lawsuit Note Patent Fraud Steam Engine Gove

Approximately 8" by 12"

    • Up for sale is a fascinating, original 1841 handwritten legal document from Chittenden County, Vermont. This manuscript offers a compelling glimpse into early American industrial history, featuring a legal dispute over a fraudulent machine patent and an ongoing contract to build a steam engine.

      The document consists of a two-page legal affidavit (written on one leaf, front and back) titled "Motion for Continuance" in the case of Edwin Willett v. Jesse Gove.

      🔍 Document Highlights & Content:
      • The Steam Engine Connection: The defendant, Jesse Gove of Burlington, Vermont, states under oath that he is under contract with L. Stearns & Brothers of Pittsfield, Massachusetts to "put up for them a Steam Engine" to be completed by August 20, 1841. He requests a court continuance because his absolute personal attendance is required in Pittsfield to finish the engine.

      • The Patent Machine Fraud: Gove further states that the lawsuit against him was brought over a promissory note given for a "patent right in a machine." Gove boldly declares that the plaintiff (Edwin Willett) falsely represented the machine's usefulness, and that the device "turned out to be entirely useless and good for nothing," meaning the financial consideration for the note completely failed.

      • Official Signatures:

 
?>